Inclusión de atributos de calidad en la evaluación de la gestión del conocimiento y la innovación
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública (ESAP) Colombia
Abstract
Description
Problemática: En Colombia, el Modelo Integrado de Planeación y Gestión (MIPG) establece atributos de calidad para evaluar la dimensión de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Innovación (GCI) en entidades públicas. Sin embargo, no es claro como los actuales instrumentos oficiales incorporan estos atributos. Objetivo: Examinar la alineación entre los índices oficiales de desempeño de la GCI en las entidades del Distrito Capital de Bogotá y los atributos de calidad establecidos para esta dimensión en el MIPG-versión 5. Metodología: Mediante análisis cualitativo, se evalúa la estructura del Índice de Desempeño Institucional (IDI) 2024 y el Índice de Innovación Pública (IIP) 2023 para determinar su correspondencia con los atributos de calidad. Resultados: El análisis reveló una incorporación parcial de los atributos con algunos elementos representados, pero omitiendo aspectos fundamentales como la incorporación de decisiones institucionales estratégicas en los sistemas de información disponibles. Conclusión: Estos índices constituyen los instrumentos oficiales para medir y comparar la gestión en las entidades del Distrito Capital de Bogotá en esta dimensión, por lo tanto, los líderes de la GCI deben comprender su alcance para identificar aspectos críticos no cubiertos y establecer planes de acción apropiados para consolidar la GCI al interior de las entidades.
Problem statement : In Colombia, the Integrated Planning and Management Model (MIPG) establishes quality attributes to evaluate the Knowledge and Innovation Management (KIM) dimension in public entities. However, it is not clear how current official instruments incorporate these attributes. Objective: To examine the alignment between official KIM performance indices in the entities of the Capital District of Bogotá and the quality attributes established for this dimension in MIPG-version 5. Methodology: Through qualitative analysis, the structure of the Institutional Performance Index (IPI) 2024 and the Public Innovation Index (PII) 2023 are evaluated to determine their correspondence with the quality attributes. Results: The analysis revealed partial incorporation of the attributes, with some elements represented but omitting fundamental aspects such as the incorporation of strategic institutional decisions into available information systems. Conclusion: These indices constitute the official instruments to measure and compare management in the entities of the Capital District of Bogotá in this dimension. Therefore, KIM leaders must understand their scope to identify critical aspects not covered and establish appropriate action plans to consolidate KIM within the entities.
Problem statement : In Colombia, the Integrated Planning and Management Model (MIPG) establishes quality attributes to evaluate the Knowledge and Innovation Management (KIM) dimension in public entities. However, it is not clear how current official instruments incorporate these attributes. Objective: To examine the alignment between official KIM performance indices in the entities of the Capital District of Bogotá and the quality attributes established for this dimension in MIPG-version 5. Methodology: Through qualitative analysis, the structure of the Institutional Performance Index (IPI) 2024 and the Public Innovation Index (PII) 2023 are evaluated to determine their correspondence with the quality attributes. Results: The analysis revealed partial incorporation of the attributes, with some elements represented but omitting fundamental aspects such as the incorporation of strategic institutional decisions into available information systems. Conclusion: These indices constitute the official instruments to measure and compare management in the entities of the Capital District of Bogotá in this dimension. Therefore, KIM leaders must understand their scope to identify critical aspects not covered and establish appropriate action plans to consolidate KIM within the entities.